Tuesday, May 9, 2017

A Trophic Dynamic View of Ecosystem



Energy losses limit the number of trophic levels in ecosystems. We began chapter 18 with a partial and highly qualitative energy budget of a forest: sunlight shines down on the canopy of a forest-some is reflected, some is converted to heat energy, and some is absorbed by chlorophyll. the energy budgets of ecosystem reveal that with cach transfer or conversion of energy, some energy is lost. to verify that these losses have the potential to limit the number of trophic level in ecosystems, we need to quantity the flow of energy through ecosystem. One of the very first ecologist to quantify the flux of energy through ecosystems was Raymond Linderman.

A Trophic Dynamic View of Ecosystem

Raymond received his Ph. D., where his studies of the ecology of Cedar Bog Lake led him to a view of ecosystems far ehead of its time. Lindeman webt from Minnesota to Yale University, whwre his association with G. F. Hutchinson from 1941 to 1942, led to the publication of a revolutionary paper with the provocative title, “ The Trophic-Dynamic Aspect of Ecology”. In this paper, Lindman articulated a view of ecosystems centered on the flows of energy through ecosystems that remains influential to this day. Like Tansley before him, Lindaman pointed out the difficulty and artificiality of separating organism from their environment and promoted an ecosystem view of nature. Lindeman concluded that the ecosystem concept is fundamental to the study of trophic dynamics, which he defined as the transfer of energy from one part of an ecosystem to another.
Lindeman suggested grouping organism within an ecosystem into trophic levels: primary producers, primary consumers, secondary consumers, tertiary consumers and so forth. In this scheme, each trophic level feeds on the one immediately below it. Energy enters the ecosystem as primary producers engage in photosynthesis using solar energy to convert CO2 into biomass. As energy is transferred from one trophic level to another, energy is lost due to limited consumption and assimilation, respiration by consumers, and heat production. The percentage of energy in yhe biomass at a lower thropic level that is called ecological efficiency, which varies from about 5% to 20%. As a result, the quantity of energy in an ecosystem decrease with each successive thophic level, forming a pyramid-shape distribution of energy among trophic levels. Lindeman called these trophic pyramids “Eltonian pyramids”, since Charles Elton was the first to purpose that distribution of energy among trophic levels is shape like a pyramid.

ADAPTATION OF ORGANISM



Adaptation is a way of living things to adapt to the environment in which they live. This adaptation is needed by living beings on earth, because every earthly environment has its own characteristics. Suppose the temperature is very cold temperatures and there is plenty of water whereas otherwise in the desert the temperature is hot, arid, and difficult to get water.
Therefore place the living creatures have different shapes and characteristics to adapt themselves to the environment. Like, Polar bears have thick fur to protect their bodies from cold temperatures and in camel desert have a hump or a protruding part on its back as a reserve of water because it is difficult to get water.
The environment in which living creatures multiply is called habitat. In general, living beings that have adapted in certain environments are difficult to adapt elsewhere. Except humans, because humans have the brain and mind as a tool to adapt to various environments. This brain and mind is used to adjust the environment to its will. Suppose, the poles are cold then he made a house that is shaped like a dome because with such a form the temperature inside would be warmer.

Kinds of Adaptation
A. Morphological Adaptation
Adaptation of morphology is the adjustment of the body shape of living things or the living organisms to the environment in which they live. In this adaptation is usually a form of adjustment of body shape as in the shape of the beak, shape of the foot, as well as the whole body shape as a whole.
Adaptation to this body shape serves to adjust the shape of his body by the way he gets food and adjust his body shape with how he lived in the place.
B. Physiological Adaptation
Adaptation Physiology is the adjustment of the body function of a living thing to its environmental condition. This adaptation can not be seen directly by the eye. Because the adaptation of physiology concerns the function of internal organs of living things with their environment. Such as the human heart function to adapt to high areas.
C. Adaptation of Behavior
Behavioral adaptation is the way in which the creatures adapt to their surroundings in the form of behavior. This behavioral adaptation is related to the actions of living things to adapt or protect themselves from predators. In addition, adaptation of behavior associated with the habit of living things to adapt and maintain their life in an environment.

Examples of Adaptation
Examples of this adaptation are divided into three parts: the example of morphological adaptation, examples of physiological adaptations and examples of behavioral adaptations.
A. Examples of morphological adaptations
Examples of morphological adaptations to terrestrial living creatures:
1) An xerophyte plant such as a cacti has thick stems to store water, has a spiny leaf that serves to reduce evaporation, and has long, spreading roots for easier access to water. This is done because of its arid and barren habitat.
2) The desert bunny has a big ear to cool off. Because when the rabbit's blood flows through the ears the blood releases the surrounding heat.
3) Desert frog has horned legs useful for digging holes up to 3 meters. This hole is used to protect itself from the scorching heat of the desert.
B. Example of Physiological adaptation
Examples of physiological adaptations include:
1) When in a high area like peak mountain humans produce more red blood grains to bind more oxygen. Because in the highlands the atmospheric pressure is smaller than the lowland so only a little oxygen can enter our bodies.
2) Fish that live in salt water is more concentrated than urine ika that live in fresh water. Fish that live in the salty water to release more concentrated urine so that the amount of salt in the fish is not excessive.
C. Examples of Adaptation of Behavior
Examples of behavioral adaptations:
1) Chameleons change their body color according to their environment more easily get their prey.
2) Whales and dolphins regularly appear on the surface of water for breathing. Because the whales and dolphins are mammals that breathe with the lungs.
3) Termites that peel the skin will be eaten back by the termites. This is done because within the skin of termites there is a termite intestines that come peeling and the intestine has a flagellate that produces cellulase enzymes that can digest wood. In addition, young termites lick the rayao adult rectum in order to obtain cellulase enzymes to digest wood.

The survival curve is a graph showing the number or proportion of living individuals at any age for a given species or group (eg male / female or female / female). A survival curve can be constructed for a given cohort (a group of individuals of the same age) based on the life table.
There are three common types of survival curves:
• Type I curves characterized by high survival early in life and moderation, followed by a rapid decline in later life survival. These species are typical curves that produce some offspring but treat them well, including humans and many other large mammals.
• The Type II curve is an intermediate between type I and type III, where constant mean mortality is experienced regardless of age. Some birds and some lizards follow this pattern.
• Type III curves, the greatest deaths experienced since the beginning of life, with relatively low mortality rates for those still living in the bottleneck effect. This type of curve is a characteristic of a species that produces a large number of offspring (see r / K selection theory). This curve includes most marine invertebrates. For example, oysters produce millions of eggs, but most larvae die from predation or other causes; Larvae that survive long enough to produce a living hard shell relatively long.
The number or proportion of living organisms is plotted on the y-axis, generally with a logarithmic scale beginning with 1,000 individuals, while their age, often as the maximum proportion of age, is plotted on the x-axis. In mathematical statistics, the function of the syntax is one of the special forms of the survival curve and plays the basic part in the analysis of the syntax.

Mimicry on insects: Strategy to survive!



According to the Encarta Encyclopedia (2005), mimicry is defined as the physical or behavioral resemblance or behavior by one species to another species that benefits itself, or indirectly both. Organisms that "mimic" are called mimics, whereas "imitated" organisms are called models. In nature, quite a number of organisms, both plants and animals that do mimicry for defense purposes as well as gain feed. Insects are one type of animal that performs mimicry, and in many cases proves to be effective.
The phenomenon of mimicry itself was first researched by Henry Walter Bates, a naturalist from England in 1862 on a butterfly in the jungle of Brasilia. Until now there are known types of mimicry on insects, and several well-known species are (1) Batesian mimicry, which refers to the name H.W. Bates, the first researcher of this phenomenon, (2) Mullic mimicry, (3) mimicry of Browerian (similar to Batesian mimicry but occurs in individuals within a species), and (4) Peckhamian mimicry (aggression mimicry).

Batesian Mimicry
The mechanism of this mimicry is imitation by a copycat insect classified as harmless in insect models that are either dangerous or toxic. A well-known example is the syrphid flies of the genus Eristalis spp. Whose morphology and behavior are very similar to the Apis mellifera bee species (Golding and Edmunds, 2000). In both studies, the syrphid fly proved to mimic the behavior of bees very closely from the time aspect of the visit to a particular plant-plant flower, in addition it is morphologically very similar. Other examples, such as the staphylinid myrmecophilous beetle, Pella comes capable of mimicking the morphology of the host ant, and even prevent it from predation by the predator (tree frog) (Taniguchi et al., 2005).

Mullicular Mimicry
In the beginning, the Mullerian mimicry phenomenon is considered a Batesian mimicry. However, then the phenomenon of Mullerian mimicry is a completely different phenomenon with Mullerian mimicry. In Mullerian mimicry, two species that are both equally toxic or harmful share a body color (hazardous!) Signal that is usually a bright color (aposematic or warning coloration, to be discussed later). The German naturalist Fritz Muller explains that the advantage of this mimicry phenomenon is that if two species share an aposematic signal, it confuses the predators of both species that do the mimicry. These shared species are referred to as members of the Mullerian complex. Examples of the two species that perform Mullerian mimicry are the King Butterfly, Danaus plexippus and Viceroy Butterfly, the equally unpleasant Limenitis archippus, sharing a pattern of body color and behavior.

Mimicry Browerian
This phenomenon is considered to be similar to Batesian mimicry, but occurs among individuals in one species. This phenomenon is found by Lincoln P. Brower and Jane Van Zandt Brower, and also called automimicry. This mimicry appears in butterfly species, such as D. plexippus who eat milkweed plants that vary in their toxicity. The advantage of this mimicry is, if the predator feeds on some individual larvae or imago, and then finds that one individual feels very uncomfortable, then the predator will soon stop eating it, and leave the butterfly colony. That is, some individuals become sacrifices for the salvation of all the remaining individuals.

Mimicry Peckhamian
Insects that apply this type of mimicry (called Peckhamian mimicry referring to its discoverer, George and Elizabeth Peckhman) will mimic the characteristics of insects that are harmless or may be useful to "deceive" the host or prey, making it easier to prey on it without being suspected by the members of its prey colony. For example, for example, three species of sulfphid flies predate the genus Microdon that mimics the host ant pupa (genus Camponotus and Formica). Observations by Garnett et al (1985) demonstrate that instar larvae 1 and 2 Microdon are able to mimic the morphology, even the distinctive "odor" of the two species of the ants are so similar, allowing them to prey on the ants. Another example is the female Photuris firefly that is able to emit light flickering patterns similar to the light flickering pattern of firefly species of Photinus. As a result, Photinus's male fireflies were captivated by the Photuris's mating invitation, which culminated in death, for once it arrived, the "female" turned out to be a prospective predator! Even more intense, by preying on Photinus, the Photurisian females will obtain a useful steroidal compound of lucibufagins as a defense compound of the prey (Eisner et al., 1997).